![]() Probably what China is really interested in is evidence of intelligence groups that operate more like their own, which would include deep cover CIA agents. “But it’s certainly worth taking a look at.” official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive topic. “That’s not conclusive that the person might be undercover CIA,” said one U.S. ![]() embassies but are missing from the OPM records might, through a process of elimination, reveal the identities of CIA operatives serving under diplomatic cover. intelligence operatives by scrutinizing the OPM files. officials have said that a foreign spy service might be able to identify U.S. For instance, from this WP article…Įven so, some U.S. There are various ways they could use this data to get some actually valuable information. This definitely, then, includes people not just from the military, or contracting agencies (many of whom, including as Snowden was, are, in fact, ‘undercover’). So, the 90% percentage is not unreasonable. You have 4.5 million people now with active clearance. And expose undercover agents overseas in other agencies besides the CIA. And this leaves out everyone else they may work with, and other agencies. ![]() The critical information, which was not encrypted, involves a complete rundown of the personal lives of some 90 percent of applicants for security clearances, mainly excepting most undercover CIA agents.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |